Saturday, 1 December 2007

From Jayanti Patel, Coventry

In Hindu tradition, our entire environment is regarded as sacred and there are specific instances which provide important symbols for this. Witness the reverence Hinduism has for the great rivers, for example, the sacred Ganga river for their life giving and life sustaining qualities, the mountains with life giving forces and provide protection. Indeed the whole land is regarded as the mother in addition to regard for million of plants and animals.

The RAMA Sethu land formation (also known as Adams bridge) linking southern India to northern Sri Lanka is an example of such sacred symbol which is revered in Hindu tradition as the bridge constructed by Lord RAMA and his army to cross into Lanka and defeat the demon Ravana.

India has recently revived the idea of having the Sethusamodram canal built between itself and Sri Lanka .This means digging a big hole through the RAMA Sethu Bridge and effectively destroying it. All for saving a day in travel time. Damage is being done to our enviroment, increasing pollution, and destruction of natural habitats.

It will destroy the faith of Hindus as we celebrate Diwali and know that Ram Rajia existed.

I beg you not to destroy RAMA Sethu.

From Hansa Patel, Coventry

As a Hindu, I am very sad to hear that the sethusamudram Canal project authorities have planned to blast the Ram Sethu. No matter what anybody says, history tells us that it was build by Shri Ram to cross over to destroy Ravan and bring Sitaji back. It is also traditional bridge between India and Sri Lanka and adds to the growth of the nation.

It will destroy the faith of Hindus because we believe it is connected to Diwali celebrations and the belief that Ram Rajia existed. Everyone needs faith and hope to believe in someone to keep their life going.

Please do not let them destroy it .

Thursday, 15 November 2007

From Janak Shah, Birmingham

Please stop destroying the Ram Sethu. It is India's most ancient monument and is very sacred to every Hindu in the world. My mum has told me stories on Ramayan and I have watched videos on it and have seen the scene where the bridge is being built. So many creatures helped the bridge and if you destroy it, so many lives will be destroyed too. The ocean life will be destroyed. The people who live on fishing for food will starve to death. It is a historical and cultural monument for all Hindus and is related to the Ramayan and Ram did exist. So please, please, do not destroy the bridge.

JAI SHREE RAM!!!

Janak Shah, Birmingham, 7 years old

Monday, 5 November 2007

From Niravsinh Parmar, London

Once Guruji said “Only few people get challenged in their life, those who are challenged must be proud of them and must accept the challenge and convert it into a glorious victory”.

Destruction of shree Ram setu is a challenge from Sonia Maino/Gandhi [A hardliner Catholic Christian] to all Hindus especially us swayamsevaks, the magnitude of this challenge is such that it cannot be let gone unanswered.

We will fight this at all levels, at all fronts, at every place where we are, we will reflect ram setu in everything we do, and we will do anything it takes to save Ram setu. There is only one mission in our life to save Ram setu; we will all participate because bhagwan ram has chosen us all for this divine seva.

We shall start our victorious campaign from this Diwali [it is never too late] we shall bring awareness to Hindu community at large by public advertising at Hindu hot spot’s such as temples and community centre’s. Temples like Watford ISKON, and Neasden Swaminarayan and other’s in England/Europe/USA. We shall organise hoardings/signs of “Save ram setu” and other’s, distribute leaflets. We will alert every Hindu against this barbaric act.

If not you and me there is no one else who is going to fight to save Ram Setu.

There is no reason for us to loose this war, because Bhagwan Ram is on our side, leave everything behind only think of Ram setu 24X7X365.

Victory is resting in Lotus feet of Bhagwan Ram.

Jay Shree Ram

Sunday, 4 November 2007

From Raj Chevli, Bolton

The sethusamudaram is one of the most iconic things I have ever heard about and seen. When looking at the satellite pictures and also on Google earth it looks beautiful especially the way Mother Nature has changed the way it looks over many thousands of years.

This is literally concrete evidence of the Ramayana and how it was never a myth. It is very sentimental to us Hindus - as it should be sentimental to the world as this is real history.

Destroying such an archaeological fact would have a great effect on the future as the story of Ramayana will therefore be looked at as a myth, and the myth will turn into a legend.

I believe the bridge is a part of nature and only nature can erode such history if it is to be eroded. I’m a big believer on nature and how it should not be toyed around with by us humans.

The Indian government with a strong Hindu cultural background should not have even considered destroying such history especially one more priceless and sacred than anything else on earth.

From Aditya Narain, Birmingham

I believe that destroying the Ram Settu is wrong and it shouldn't be destroyed for something as trivial as ship routes. I feel that a 45 minute cut in journey time can't be better than a loss of a national heritage site that has remained for thousands of years. Moreover, I can't believe that the Indian Government is suggesting this; after all, when other counties find even pottery or utensils underground they stop whatever work they are doing to preserve the memory of their ancestors.

Also, I believe that the cons of knocking down the Ram Settu greatly outweigh the pros. For one, the wildlife around the area will be extremely disrupted and over 4000 species of plants and animals will lose their homes. Moreover, the few jobs that can be gained from destroying the bridge will be lost when local fishermen loose their jobs because the area around the Ram Settu would have been open as international waters.

Furthermore, the Ram Settu cushions the coasts of India and Sri Lanka from tsunamis, and this is extremely important as, if a tsunami took place, many more people would die if the Ram Settu is demolished. I also think that a government of a country with 80% Hindus should listen to the views of everyone and should respect the beliefs of everyone by not questioning the existence of one the major people in our history and in our religion. This subject has caused a lot of protest in India, where many Hindus are angry that the Government is proposing such a thing and the majority of people are against it. I believe that we should reserve India's national heritage!!!

Saturday, 3 November 2007

From Dinesh Bhatti, Coventry

I believe, Shree Ram is the incarnation of the God, Lord Vishnu. Shree Ram came to the Earth to free us from the tyranny of the evil King Ravan ruler of Lanka.

Shree Ram was born in the Kingdom of Ayodhya, to the King Dasrath and Queen Kaushalya. He had three brothers, Bharat, Laxman and Satrugna, and married to the Princes Sita from the Kingdom of Mithila.

Shree Ram was exiled for fourteen years by the King Dasrath under the influence of the King's his second wife Kaikai. As a loyal Prince he left Ayodhya with his wife Sita and brother Laxman, and lived in the forest as hermits.

During this time, Shree Ram killed many of the King Ravan's henchmen in the forest. The evil King Ravan, in return attacked Shree Ram with treachery and kidnapped Devi Sita to the Island of Lanka.

Shree Ram vowed to find his wife Sita and avenge her abduction by killing Ravan. This he did by building alliance with the monkey King Sugrev, and with the help of Shree Hanuman, the monkeys built a bridge across the Indian Ocean to the Island of Lanka. Shree Ram with the help of Ravan's youngest brother Vibhishan, and the army of King Sugrev launched an attack on Lanka. After killing the King Ravan, Shree Ram gave the Kingdom of Lanka to Vibhishan and returned to Ayodhya with his wife Sita and brother Laxman.

From Indravadan Gandhi, Coventry

The recent controversy in the media regarding regarding RAM SETHU and Sethusamudram. project linking Gulf of Mannar with Palk Straight has hurt the feelings of millions of Hindus in India and around the world.

The comments by the chief Minister of Tamil Nadu and the Affidavit filed by the UPA Government in the High Court (withdrawn at later date) challenging the Hindu religion and faith saying that Bliagvan Ram never existed and saying that Ram Sethu is natural build of sand due currents in the Straight over thousands of years.

The Ramayan and Mahabharat are the soul and culture of every Hindu of Bharat, if you take any out of the equation than the Foundation Base of Hindu Culture will collapse. Ram and Krishna are the belief and Faith of every Hindu over thousands of years and this cannot be erased by filing affidavit in court or any adverse comments by any chief ministers. It will only further affirm the beliefs of Hindus.

Ram Sethu is a heritage of Hindu culture, so we call upon the Government of India to immediately cease the destruction of the Holy Ram Sethu bridge between India and Sri Lanka. The bridge is and ancient monument held sacred by over one billion people all around the world. The destruction of this bridge will not only offend our religious sentiment, but will also pose a great risk to the environment, oceanic life and Indian cost line. It will also endanger the livelihood of thousands of fisherman in the local area.

The government of India is entitled to take steps to protect the commercial and trade interest of India. However, such steps should not be at the cost of offending the religious sentiment of Hindus around the world.

So we as Hindus request the Central Government to stop The Sethu Samudram Shipping Canal Project also urge the team to stop all dredging work and withdraw all equipment from the site.

From Raghav Chandegra, North London

I am writing about why I strongly oppose the destruction of the Ram Setu Bridge. I am astounded by the fact that the government in India have even considered the destroying of the bridge as a possibility. The Ramayan is one of the greatest epics in Hindu dharma, it teaches us essential qualities of leading a good life, and it is a fundamental part of our religion. However many times the Ramayan is read, the reader never loses interest even if they know what happens in the end. There is no need to destroy such a historic and religious bridge, which represents the strength of our Hindu faith for a few economic reasons.

The Ram Setu is a great Hindu heritage site, and to destroy it would be a direct attack on all Hindus around the world. The reasons for which I oppose the destruction of the bridge are not only religious; there are also huge environmental factors. The wildlife that live around this bride depend on it for protection, and if it was destroyed their lives would be in danger. The Ram Setu acts a barrier against any upcoming tsunamis and destroying this bridge would mean there is greater risk, and their will be a devastating effect on the people in the south of India. The government say that the ships would be able to make a shortcut through this canal that they could build, but only around an hour worth of fuel would be spent, which is very little when we look at the disadvantages of destroying the bridge.

We as Hindus must do our best to prevent the government from destroying this bridge. Let our voices be heard!


Jai Sri Ram!!!

From Narottam Joshi, Coventry

It is greatest shame when our leaders for saving their seats are trying to kill the deep seated belief in Shree Ram in millions of Hindus. These so called leaders should first find out where did the word Ram come from in India before destroying the Ramsethu.

They should ask why they themselves say RAM RAM on meeting each other? Why did every Gandhji's bhajan have RAM in it ?
Why did Gandhiji utter Ram Ram as his last words before dying?
Where did the name RAMESHWAR come for the most Southern town in India? Why every third person's name in India has Ram in his name?

India is only in existence because of Shree Ram, otherwise it would have long back converted in Islamic Country after or during the Moghul rule. Why can't these so called leaders understand this?

From Ajay Popat, Manchester

I am REALLY CONCERNED at the news of both Tamil Nadu government and central government’s PLAN to destroy “Ram Setu” to make way for a canal project linking India and Sri Lanka.

Ram Setu is an ancient structure and is Indian heritage belonging to ALL the people of INDIA and not just Tamil Nadu’s government to break as they please. I request Indian government to immediately suspend this project till it is re-designed and re-aligned properly to address safety aspects incorporating detailed scientific, technical, strategic reviews with viable alternative plan by constituting a multi-disciplinary expert team to save our ancient structure.


Furthermore I request government of India for protection of this sacred ancient monumental heritage site of the nation and necessary measures to declare it one of the worlds ancient monumental heritage.

India has the longest coastline of 7500 km with the richest underwater cultural and archaeological repository and, according to Maritime expert representing India at UNESCO convention, Dr S. R. Rao SSCP, has violated all international norms and conventions for saving underwater cultural heritage, a mandatory for every maritime member to “list, preserve and protect all underwater cultural sites.

As a Hindu I have always believed in Lord Ram as incarnation of Lord Vishnu and most ideal person to follow (Purshotam Bhagwan Shri Ram). As Lohana, Raghuvansi, those belonging to the clan Raghuvansi of whom Shri Ram was the ideal king and after his son Lav the clan of Lohana started in Punjab, I see a clear link to Lord Ram as my predecessor and I can not accept an athesit CM of Tamil Nadu and Congress government (Atheist Ambika Soni) denying the existence of my predecessor. It is like asking if there is any pro of Shri Karunadhi’s and smt Soni’s ever had great, great grandparent as there is no proof of their existence since there was no camera invented . This is clearly hurting the sentiment of large number of Hindus around the world but in particularly of Lohanas who believe we are the descendant of Lord Ram.

Finally destroying the bridge may impact local people, animals and only benefit multinational companies who see this as an opportunity to make money. But we have to ask ourselves is it really worth disrupting animal habitat in the region as well as destroying an important part of world history and heritage for small gain as projected by this government? I request Indian Government to STOP DESTROYING INDIAN HERITAGE RAMSETU and DISMISS AMBIKA SONI AND TN CM, Mr KARUNANIDDHI FOR HURTING THE SENTIMENT HINDU WORLD WIDE BY DENYING EXISTENCE OF LORD RAM AND MOST SACRED TEXT OF RAMAYAN.

From Deepti, Ashton under Lyne

Regarding the issue about the bridge from Bharat to Lanka, my views on it are that they shouldn't knock it down.

It's an ancient monument that was built by lord Ram and the monkey army, its evidence to back up a part of the ramayana. Also it is the habitat of many types of wildlife. If the bridge is taken away it will destroy so many species of wildlife living there. This is a huge environmental impact.

They are destroying this magnificent bridge because they want to build a shipping canal, why would they want to do that? Lots of people put effort into building the bridge and now they're going to knock it down as if it has no significance?

Well, I think it does. STOP IT NOW!!

From Shiva Bhagat, Ashton under Lyne

I think that Ram is an brave, kind, generous human. I think that when he had a battle after crossing into Lanka over the Ram Setu with Ravan to save Sita was realy good. And the end was really good where he could finally be with Sita. Hanuman and other vanars made bridge with Ram's name on the stone so that it did not sink. We should save this bridge for us to go and see when I visit India.

From Jayesh Joshi, Ashton under Lyne

Most of our folk tales are based on facts and now to discover the bridge built by Ram is a proof that the folk tales is a fact.

When discoveries such as these are made in the world they are handled with much care , like the Pyramids. On the same basis Rams Bridge should also be handled with care as it is living proof of the past.

The bridge should be left as it is so that future generation can see the Ram existed and is not just a folk tale. This bridge symbolises Ram and and thus civilisation existed over 7000 years ago. We can learn from this bridge that if it was possible to build such a bridge 7000 years ago then with the knowledge from veda what can we achieve today?

Jai Shree Krishna

From Tushar Joshi, Ashton under Lyne

I think That the Setubanda Should Not Be Destroyed Because It is A Religious Landmark.

From Alpa Mistry, Bradford

OM JAI SHRI RAM

My views: Ram and Ramayana live in the hearts of every Hindu, in India, as well as across the world. RAM SETU is not only historical for all Hindus but also very sacred. As the Ramayana teaches us that in order to get Sita back Ram had to get tocross the sea to reach Lanka. With the help of the animal kingdom of the Vanaras, Ram built the bridge RAM SETU. After building the bridge Ram crossed the sea, reached Lanka, fought, killed Ravan and got Sita back. The thought of destroying this sacred bridge is very disrespectful to allHindus.

And to declare a statement that,Ram and Ramayana never existed is not only disrespectful but very hurtful. The Ram Sethu land formation is an example of such a sacred symbol, and to create canal between Sri Lanka and itself for the sake of new business is not really justified in my view. Taking this bridge away is going to cause more controversy. There will more cost than benefit. Millions of rupees will go into the building of the canal. It will attract international fishermen driving out the local fishermen and the local industries, destroying local communities en masse.

There are non-economic costs. The bridge is a sacred place of worship and pilgrimage to millions of people. It will be a major offence to the Hindus. There will be huge environmental cost through mass industrialisation and pollution created by it. Natural resources will be exploited, the habitat destroyed and ecosystems changed forever bringing the risks of natural disasters like the tsunami.

The destruction of the natural habitat will kill the ancient way of life. The region is home to some 400 endangered marine species including many fish, turtles, and dolphins.These species will be destroyed with the dredging and heavy traffic. Talking of traffic, what happens when one of these huge cargo ships or oil tankers has an accident and releases toxic waste into the sea? What happens to the more than 4000 species that exist along the Ram Sethu and the local shoreline and communities that depend on the seas for their existence? What happens to the area used for dumping the estimated 62 millions tonnes of silt that need to be excavated for this project?

The Ramayana and Mahabahrat are historical facts written in terms of stories and passed down to generations. THERE IS AMPLE PROOF BESIDES the satellite pictures prove the existence ofRam built bridge. This has recently been endorsed by the famous Sunitha Williams, Indian origin NASA astronaut. What more evidence is needed? Why is it that Hindus and their faith are always taken for granted, abused and insulted whereever and whenever?

In my view Ram was living then, and still lives on. He exists in everyHindu heart.

JAI SHRI RAM

From Meera, Sona and Mohit, NW England

Namaste

We do not think the bridge should be destroyed because NASA has taken pictures of the Adam's Bridge between India and Sri Lanka. They have corroborated what we Indians have been telling since time immemorial that the Adam's bridge is actually the Ram Setu, built by Lord Rama's faithful 'vaanar' soldiers. They say that the structure is man-made and dates back to about 1,700,000 years. This is a historical structure which is like a symbol of our religion.

It is ironical that a government which changes the metro rail route to protect the Qutub Minar, built with the material of destroyed temples, stops a corridor to protect the Taj Mahal's surroundings and spends crores of rupees to showcase ancient potteries and jewellery in heavily guarded museums, is destroying a unique symbol of national identity and an icon well preserved in our minds since ages. Even a child knows that a bridge was built by the friends of Lord Rama using floating stones and Rama's army marched over it to Lanka to rescue Sita and destroy the evil regime of Ravana.

The Ram Setu should not be destroyed as it provides evidence for our religion and is a historical landmark which which has a lot of importance, it is not just a normal bridge.

From Mitesh Mistry, NW England

I think they shouldn't destroy the setu because it is what Ram created, and we all believe in Ram and the Ramayan so we should respect it. The setu is a major part of the Ramayan. And Ram, Lakshman and all the army wouldn't have crossed over to Lanka without it.

From Sunit Patel, NW England

Namaste.

Being a British Hindu I have been brought up with the stories of the brave Lord Ram, Lakshman and his ever loyal and most trusted friend Hanuman to save the Princess Sita from the demon Raavan. In order for Lord Ram to reach Lanka he and his army had to build a bridge, from the southern tip of India to Lanka. The bridge was built by stones where the name Ram was written to help support the weight of the army. This small part from the Ramayana, one of our greatest Hindu texts, has been heard not just by Hindus from India and around the world but by many other people of different faiths. Even in most schools the story is taught.

When I first heard about the bridge a few years ago I was most intrigued. To see pictures from a NASA space shuttle of the bridge helped not only me but many others to solidify the existence of an event that happened in India’s history.

Why destroy such an important part of our history? To improve the trade transportation between the two countries thus improving the economy. Yes it does have its advantages but improving the economy can be done in other ways.

Lord Krishna’s Dwarka, which is now underwater had once existed too. Circular shaped objects have been found underwater and these signify soldiers who belonged to the army of Krishna. This is again solid proof of the existence of a great being who once existed. Would we want to destroy this too?

The Lord Buddha statues that towered high above any person, were found in Afghanistan where Islamic extremists destroyed it by shooting missiles. This event was on world news and clearly upset many people including myself. Would we want a repeat of such an event?

Destroying the bridge could have its environmental impacts. The animal and sea life habitat could have its effects on the future to come, as everything has to eventually balance out.

Monday, 29 October 2007

From Lallubhai Mistry, Birmingham

I say to the Government of India stop playing divide and rule policies. This time on subject of Ramsethu you have taken one step too far in the wrong direction. You called your self the secular Government, which is claiming to follow Gandhian doctrines, have utterly failed to claim to be such follower. By claiming that there is no proof Lord Rama having born and that there is no proof of Rama building a bridge to Shri Lanka, you have violated the hearts and minds of hundreds of million of Hindus world over. The Ramsethu is our heritage, which is a symbol of Sanatan Dharma, and heritage of Indian civilisation. It does not belong to any Indian Government to destroy at will.

You (the Indian Government) cannot provide any written documented evidence of Bridge not built by Lord Rama.

Many experts have seriously study your project but have failed to understand the economic and ecological viability of the canal project.

I can only conclude that only one objective driving the hearts and mind of so-called secular Government that is to destroy hearts and minds of Hindus.

We are fully aware of your design, we will not let you break us. We will preserve our history and very foundation of civilisation.

From Baiju Shah, Coventry

Aside from the obvious issue of totally disregarding the sentiments and beliefs of millions of Hindus across the world, what strikes me most about the Ramsethu issue is that the government's plans are based purely on economic reasons only.

Over recent years the strides that India has made, particularly economically, have been widely championed. However, this latest move by the government signals the start of a potentially worrying trend of prioritising economic development above all other factors and considerations. In effect, it shows a higher value being placed on material rather than spiritual prosperity, in a country which, ironically, is famed for its 'spiritual mysticism' and cultural richness.

Thus I would urge the Indian government to think beyond pure financial gain and warn that if they go ahead with their plans they will be setting a dangerous precedent for the erosion of the very thing which makes the country so unique - it's religious and spiritual core.

From Kartik Dave, North London

The story of Ram and Sita has been a large part of my faith from when my parents told me story when I was young.

The story is one of the cornerstones of Hindu dharma and I find it quite shocking and appalling that the government of a so called secular country such as India which is meant to protect and respect all religions would be considering destroying such an important site in Hindu dharma and India's history.

To me it is not about whether the bridge was built by an army of monkeys but about what the bridge symbolises. Shree Ram's story teaches us very valuable lessons which are all still valid today. The physical presence is an integral part of this and destroying this would destroy a part of India's culture for good.

Is a faster shipping lane worth destroying such an important symbol of Hindu belief and upsetting the sentiment of Hindu's around the world? - I think not!!!!

From Nilesh Solanki, Borehamwood

Ram was really on this earth!. Since childhood we have been told stories of the Ramayana and Mahabharat, not knowing it was real of just a bed time story. These facts truly reinforce the rich deep history we have and the morals and lessons we can learn. We have the power to act and make a change in this world like never before and it's time we do that.

The Indian government need to realise who we are and what we stood for. It's time to learn from the values our history taught us and realise the impact all Hindus world over if this bridge was destroyed for commercial gain.

We cannot allow the destruction of our heritage which went on for so long when we were ruled, we are the power now and shall continue to remain the power .

Sunday, 28 October 2007

From Rajen Mistry, Birmingham

Why is there a need to destroy one of our greatest heritage sites? Shree Ram is the epitome of the ideal man, the ideal son, the ideal brother, the ideal king, the ideal husband. In a society where such ideal heroes are diminishing, there is increasingly a need to celebrate and commemorate the principles of Shree Ram.

I firmly believe that the decision to destroy the Ram Sethu is incorrect, highly offensive to all Hindus and one that leads to a great loss for Bharat. The Ram Sethu for many Hindus represents the bridge of crossing-over the boundaries to face the evil and destroying it.

Many have done research to prove the existence of Ram. The sheer fact that such a man-made bridge exists as described in the Ramayan a piece of proof itself. Researchers such as Pushkar Bhatnagar of Indian Revenue Service, has found that the planetary positions as described in Maharishi Valmiki’s Ramayan’s depicts the precise lifetime of Shree Ram.

Destruction of the Ram Sethu, may lead to some short-term benefits but what about the long-term impact? Pollution, loss of thousands of peoples local livelihood, increased dangers of tsunami destroying the region, the destruction of habitats of several species of animals and the destruction of one of the greatest historical heritage sites associated with Shree Ram?

Please do not destroy the Ram Sethu.

Jai Shree Ram

From Vishal Ladwa, Birmingham

I am writing to state my objection to the Sethusamudram Project. I was deeply angered to hear that the bridge was going to be destroyed for a shipping canal. This bridge was built by Shri Ram and forms a vital part of our religion. Why should we destroy this bridge for a few economic reasons? By destroying it, it is showing that a key aspect of the Ramayana is not important. If this bridge is destroyed, what other key parts of our religion will be destroyed next? All efforts to protect our Dharma would have gone to waste. It is also the sheer embarrassment to hear that the Indian Government are in favour of this project, which does damage to Hindus all around the world.

Apart from the obvious religious reasons there are many environmental impact, such as many species of wildlife and there natural environments will be destroyed, due to the formation of the shipping channel. Also the bridge provides an important barrier to protect Bharat from natural disasters. Scientists believe there are more to come and by destroying the bridge it would cause much damage, to property and lives.

Let the voice of Hindu’s be heard…stop the destruction of Shri Rams bridge!

From Pritesh Chohan, Birmingham

I am writing this in response to hearing that the bridge between India and Lanka might be destroyed. I am a Hindu, and as a Hindu, I believe in the Ramayana being a fundamental part of our culture. It is one of the greatest epics in our religion, and it tells us of how Lord Ram and his army have built the bridge This bridge not only symbolises the strength in our faith, but is a symbol of Lord Ram’s ever–existing presence. The bridge just under the surface of the water is proof that the Ramayana must have taken place, otherwise how did the bridge get there?

The Ram Sethu is a national heritage site, and demolishing it would be a direct attack on the 85% of India who are Hindu. There are other issues involved in the destruction of the bridge, apart from only religious. The wildlife around and under the bridge will lose their habitat and shelter and survival would be threatened. The risk of tsunami is already big in that area, but at least the Ram Sethu acts as a barrier. If the bridge is destroyed, the risk will increase, and a tsunami will have a devastating effect around the unprotected South Indian region, like it did in Sri Lanka in 2004. The one disadvantage is that ships will have to go all the way around Sri Lanka, to get to the other side of India. However this may only add around an hour to the time. It is a small price to pay, for such an important bridge. As you can see, the advantages of keeping the bridge far outweigh the disadvantages.

From Bharat Vadukul, Birmingham

Throughout history - national treasures and momuments have been used as trophies by countries to extoll the greatness of that country /race / society.

Yet in India - we have a government that is willing to destroy a treasure that is worthy of being a WONDER OF THE WORLD.

I fail to see the logic behind this as the evidence suggestes that the proposed canal will be a huge drain on resources and may not to as useful as is suggested.

I urge the government of India to look at the scientific evidence once again.

Finally - how can the millions of belivers in Ram and the Ram Setu be so wrong.

From Dr Tribhovan Jotangia, Coventry

The people who do not believe in Bhagiraths Bharat, or Shri Ram & Ramrajya should not be allowed in Politics in Bharat. Instead they should be summoned to listen 9 days recital by Shree Morari Bapu.

These idiots should be shown last Sunday 20th October's Zee TV showing proof of Shri Ram & Sitajis existence. This was broadcasted at 11 Am. They should be given excavations report of Ayodhya and NASA's space photographs of ramsethu.

How many times wll Hindus have to give proof of their existence & their true History? I think the time has come for Hindus to stand-up against those who insult us.


Let us unite to do this.

Jai shree Ram!

From Amit Patel, North London

Numerous times I have heard of the stories of the Ramayana. Each one engaging, meaningful, usually with a great moral behind it which can be applied to situations we face in today’s society.

Yes I am a Hindu based in the UK and I have always felt that I have a connection with India, as it is the home of my ancestors.

Some may say that wanting to protect the Ram Setu Bridge is extreme and fundamentalist. I disagree. This bridge is of great importance to the Hindus, now more so, after clear evidence of its existence.

Although being thousands of miles away from the region, I feel that this is an important part of Hindu heritage.

In modern society we are becoming ignorant in a number of areas and are always aiming to become wealthier and more affluent. I’m not saying that we should not have the determination to do well for ourselves, but that we are slowly forgetting simple human values.

Destroying the bridge could only provide economic prosperity and improved accessibility within the region.

But we have to ask ourselves is it really worth disrupting animal habitat in the region as well as destroying an important part of world history and heritage?

From Akash Solanki, Bolton

Should we really destroy something so sacred and religious, just to let a couple of ships pass around India?

I’m sure no is the answer, as the Ram Setu speaks for itself. Ram as being one of the courageous ideals and the Setu as the bridge. Ram’s Bridge, His Bridge to rescue his beloved wife. Destroying any sort of bridge without a suitable reason is wrong but doing it too Ram’s bridge is down right unacceptable. In addition, this auspicious bridge is a reminder of our heritage and roots of our culture. I’m sure many Hindus are aware of the famous epic Ramayana, well when the story is told to youngsters then the bridge is proof of the Ramayana actually taking place.

Also, the bridge acts as the Hindu religion. If this was destroyed then in theory the religion is destroyed too. In effect, many Hindus wouldn’t know Ram what he achieved.

Not only the points above, but also the risk of another horrendous tsunami could wipe about Southern India. However, the Setu can act as a barrier to slow down the rapid waves. The protection the bridge is giving can save many lives. Therefore, losing the bridge would be a loss of our roots and mainly, a huge loss to the world.

Akash Solanki, 16

Saturday, 27 October 2007

From Nandini Dhorajia, Birmingham

"Don't destroy it !!!". Please don't destroy the Ram Sethu because my favourite God Ram built this bridge many, many years ago, to save his wife Sita.

Don't destroy the bridge because the poor people who live and fish around the area will no longer be able to fish and feed their families and make money to build a better house. What's going to happen to the fishes and dolphins when the big ships come and pollute the sea?

When I was 7 years old my favourite story was about, how all the animals big and small helped Lord Ram, to build this bridge, so we should never allow it to be destroyed.

The bridge was built thousands and thousands of years ago so we should not destroy it and lose part of our history.

Nandini Dhorajia, Age 9.

Friday, 26 October 2007

From Keshav Gupta, Birmingham

I think that ram sethu should not be destroyed for a number of reasons. firstly, because it is a reminder of our heritage and roots not only for this generation, but for generations to come. imagine if in years to come hindu children all over the world start to question our religion. this is one item of 'proof' that almost proves the existence of Ram. it is unthinkable that this could happen as we are all devoted hindus however, there are many hindus, even today, that question our dharma and religion, thus the reason for the conversions to other religions that we have to deal with. this sethu could reassure those hindus that our beliefs are valid.

If the bridge was destroyed, the one fascinating part of religion today would also be destroyed and this would be a great loss to the world. this is a reminder that ram existed, if it is lost, maybe the memory of ram may even be lost. as well as this, many others have also backed the idea that this bridge was made by Ram; a team from Centre for Remote Sensing (CRS) of Bharathidasan University, Tiruchi led by Professor S.M. Ramasamy in 2003 claimed that the, "Rama's bridge could only be 3,500 years old" and, "as the carbon dating of the beaches roughly matches the dates of Ramayana, its link to the epic needs to be explored".

Therefore, this bridge is a great reminder of our heritage and roots as well as a constant reminder of the existence of Ram and therefore Vishnu. not only this, but it also acts as a barrier/protection of tsunamis, destroying it would have a great environmental impact and of course, the huge religious sentiments that would be lost if the bridge was destroyed. finally, by allowing the bridge to be destroyed for the sake of just 30 hours of time saved, we would be condoning an attack on hindus which we cannot let happen!

Thanks

Keshav Gupta, age 14

From Janak Shah, Edgware

It is ironical that a government which changes the metro rail route to protect the Qutub Minar, built with the material of destroyed temples, stops a corridor to protect the Taj Mahal's surroundings and spends crores of rupees to showcase ancient potteries and jewelry in heavily guarded museums, is destroying a unique symbol of national identity and an icon well preserved in our minds since childhood. Even a child knows that a bridge was built by the friends of Lord Rama using floating stones and Rama's army marched over it to Lanka to rescue Sita and destroy the evil regime of Ravana.

The issue concerns us all, and should be taken up without getting entangled in party lines and political games. The Ram Setu belongs to all humanity, being an important heritage site; hence the government should not allow it to become another issue affecting Hindu sensitivities. Nobody is opposing the Sethu Samudram Project, only a realignment of the route is being asked, as the present one destroys the inspirational treasure that is the Ram Setu.

Respectfully as an NRI,


Janak Shah

From Ashok Mistry, South Harrow

Ram personified Truth, no matter how extreme his situation he did the right thing, an inspiration in any language. Hindus believe he was an incarnation of God that walked the earth a few thousand years ago. There was never much solid proof though. Now there is a link, this sacred bridge is his legacy. It is a part of him. It is therefore no surprise that this bridge is rousing the passions of Hindus around the globe against a grave injustice. Essentially, the Ram Sethu Bridge is unifying a diverse community to understand it's rich heritage, and to stand shoulder to shoulder for everything it represents.

From Nimisha Mistry, Rugby

A mythology? Well, that is what some would naively call the ancient Hindu scriptures and the stories of Sri Rama and Sri Krishna. The fact is, these stories are far from being myths – they are indisputably genuine! One of the many proofs being the Setubandh (bridge) which still exists from when it was built approximately 9300 years ago. I believe the reason why it is still visible long since its construction is because it was initiated and made by Lord Rama himself with the help of his Vanara army. This bridge that exists between India and Sri Lanka must not me destroyed because that would be as sinful as disrespecting one’s religion and religious beliefs. A suggestion of this sort would be seen as outrageous in other worldly religions, so why can such ideas be even considered by the Indian government? Sri Hanumanji engraved the Lord’s holy name on each individual stone that holds the Setubandh together and Hindus believe he did so with the intention of engraving the Lord’s name in our hearts…if only we looked within to realise this, we would do anything to protect the holy Setubandh.

From Prakash Mistry, Rugby

Let’s talk about the positives here. All humans are in search of love and peace, even the Indian Government. The Setubandh (bridge) helps us achieve this since a bridge joins societies, cultures, differences and mankind to one another. The Setubandh reminds the whole world about the doings of Sri Sita, Sri Rama and Sri Hanuman and implementing their goodness in our lives. We will become better characters and our society will experience love and peace. Why should we deny future generations this precious natural gift – one of the wonders of the World? As jewellery is passed from mother to daughter, generation after generation will be passed the jewel of Sri Rama in the form of the Setubandh which will keep alive the true love and peace in this disturbing world of violence. This is for sure more valuable than unnecessary commercial enterprises of which there are no shortages in the World.

From Anil Shah, Croydon

The sethusamudram project should not go ahead because of all the reasons including:

1.Economic
2.Enviromental
3. Cultural/Heritage
4. National /security

Study after study has shown that this project is not viable for any of the reasons the Government claims would benefit.

There seems to be an ulterior agenda in this.

I challenge the TM Chief ministers and his ilk to come up with one sensible reason for doining this. Infact he is forgeting that since Ramayan his ancestors mention Ram even while taking them to the funeral pyre.!

Not only was Ram name uttered in the living life but was also accomponied on his ancestors death. Yet since his change of faith he has audacity to say there is no proof of Ram!

This is a perfect example of Macaulay method at work even after some 60 years since British left India.

This all shows how we all have to work more harder /smarter to bring back Ram rajya .

From Nilkanth Mehta, Croydon

Please consider the following points as to why the controversial project be abandoned.

- Suez & Panama canal as water ways reduce thousands of Kilometres of travel and are used by international shipping.
- Would this canal be used such international shipping and large container ships? This project was conceived in the 19th Century, in today's high tonnage shipping is this dream still valid?
- Is there any economic/development sense in this project or like some before, this ends up as a white elephant.
- The annual cost of dredging and its likely increase due to inflation.
- Any majority share holder of the dredging company holds State or Central Government post/position.
- Does the international UN Law of Sea Convention 1982 and the relevant protocols apply to this project.
- Consider the environmental & socio-ecological impact on the Indian & Shri Lankan shore line and sea-bed.
- Effect on the site where the dredged material is deposited.
- As the secular Government of India is so keen to uphold the rights and provides full support to religious feeling of the minorities, likewise it should take into account the rights and religious sentiments of the silent majority population of India.
- Finally as if India does not have enough controversies on their national level, why add to the general confusion and tension that surrounds the nation?

From Vinesh Chudasama, Birmingham

They should not destroy our holy bridge! All the Hindus in the world must support this issue and raise the voice. With the might of the pen we should stop it from being destroyed!!!

Jay Shree Ram

From Rekha and Shiv Parmar, Birmingham

Namaste.

My name is Rekha. I am a mother of a 2-year-old son and have always wished to teach my child about my faith, my religion. I heard about the Sethu Samudram project from Sharad Shah, when I took my son, Shiv Sharma to Shaakhaa.

It was at this at this point that I wondered how many other religious symbolisms would be blown to pieces by the bombshells of Indian politics before my son was old enough to understand the importance of what is... and what has been.

As much as I respect that the government is trying to do something good for our nation, I fail to see how this will benefit anyone. This includes the people of India, tourists who like to see religious spots, the marine life that has accumulated at the bridge since the building of the bridge, and even the fishing economy, as, undoubtedly, it will eventually be taken over by fisheries from other countries.

Can the government of India not see this, or have they turned a blind eye on the situation so that they may be to find some more pennies thrown at them to put into their already over-brimming pockets?

I was also shocked to hear that the chief minister of Tamil Nadu declared that none of the Ramayana happened, and that Rama never came into existence. What effect would this have on the millions of strong believers? On the children out there... and most importantly, on the onlookers from different countries, who find our situation amusing?

I hope this message contributes to putting a stop to the demolition of our beloved Rama Sethu.

Thanking you,

Rekha and Shiv

Thursday, 25 October 2007

From Bhavesh Mistry, Kenton

My first real memories of my culture and religion was that of our Diwali festival at home. So much colour, the lights, the fireworks, all family gathering together, going to the temple. The first story of my heritage, as I think it was for most, was the story of Rama and Sita, the Ramayana. I believe that we have all learnt so much from the telling and understanding of this story, and continue to learn from the characters, the events, and messages given within it, even today. When we finally learn that there is an actual bridge as described in the scriptures, it gives our hearts a huge lift as we realise that it is no longer a story, but history!

Desecration of this structure for the reasons given, to do with shipping etc., would be like slashing the throat of our culture. A huge part of everyone who holds Shri Ram with reverence would be lost. If this is the intention of the government of India then at least we know where their loyalties lie. It makes us question many other decisions they have made in the past or are hoping to make in the future. When the British ruled India they saw to the changing of history to repress the people. I do not think that it will be allowed again.

From Jayshree Parmar

Allow me to introduce myself... My name is Jayshree Parmar, and I am a student at university. I am a strong believer in Hinduism. I have only been to my home country once, for three weeks. For the majority of which i visited temples, and all of the landmarks that have always been praised. Yet still I did not have enough.

I'd always wanted to go to see the Rama Sethu, and it was one of my bigest aims to go and accomplish this one day.

All I would like to say is this:

I have never been given any proof for my religion to be existent. But neither have I been shown otherwise. But every other faith also has this dilemma... but I have not yet to this day heard of the rules of the Vatican, or the ways of the Pope, or the runnings of a Masjid, or the beliefs of a Muslim waver.

So why is it that this happens in Hinduism?

People constantly argue that Hindu children do not know enough of their culture. In effect, they are called coconuts - although they are Indians, they may as well be English due to their ignorance. Is it their fault?

What I would like to know is how people can excpect anyone to know anything when major religious structures are being demolished to make a canal? What part of our religion will be left standing at this rate, to tell to our children the strength of our faith, to give them the small hope of belief? The biggest insult is that they are walking over our religion to dish out fish free to other countries.

The Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu said with much ease that Rama bhagwaan and the Ramayana are fabrications. Does he have a faith of his own? If yes, then what is it? Money? If it is based on a God that is not quite as materialistic, then what proof does he has of this particular faith. Generally, I respect every other culture and religion. If it helps, I even go to Mass with my friend before going to the Mandir every Sunday.

India, and the Rama Sethu has given sanctuary to several millions of sea creatures, many of which are known to be endangered species? Why are they now denied their home? Is there not enough vegetation to feed the government on a daily basis, large bellies require a larger appetite?

Is it any wonder that so many millions of Indians starve every day?

I have read a few articles regarding the project. They say that it will help people get new jobs. How long will this last before people from other countries see the rich catches, and bring themselves to our holy grounds, to cast their nets in out waters? It is a well known fact that India has been incapable of defending itself from any form of attack - probably due to similar foolish governmentals.So what do they plan to do this time? Lose more land and sea?

I apologise if I have sounded rude in any way... but this is a matter of a state, of a faith, and of peoples beliefs, and I strongly believe that this deviant act should be stopped. If there is any way in which you could pass this on to the people who think that the project is a good idea, please do. It would be very much appreciated.

Thanking You

From Paresh Mistry, Edinburgh

There are several significant reasons why such a project should not go ahead. One of these is the religious aspect. Bhagwan Shri Rama and the Ramayana are central components of our Hindu Dharma. The Ramayana is not a mythology or simply moral stories to narrate to children.

Factual evidence is available as a result of excavations which reinforces the truth that Shri Ram existed and that the Ramayana narrates a true story of the events at that time. The bridge between India and Sri Lanka has been viewed from space by NASA astronauts adding to the factual credibility. Destroying such a sacred symbol of Hindu heritage would be sacrilege.

The appearance of the Lord Vishnu as Shri Rama on earth teaches one and all of the ideal life to lead – duty as a son, husband, father and citizen of the society. The Great War which ensued after Shri Rama, Lakshman, Hanumanji and the entire monkey army crossed the bridge represents that good overcomes the evil in society. Therefore the Ram Sethu has great importance and significance in Shri Rama defeating the evil Ravana and rescuing Sita mata. This restored Dharma enabling society to once again live in a fair, peaceful and prosperous society.

From Dhiraj Shah, Birmingham

Ram Sethu is our heritage

I have studied the present issues concerning the Ram Sethu project from all aspects. While there is certainly a benefit in creating a link between Bay of Bengal and Arabian sea through a canal, it should not be at the cost of destroying the world’s oldest manmade bridge. Ram Sethu is one of the evidence of our great and glorious history which every Hindu should be proud of. No nation ever tries to destroy its history. Swami Vivekananda had once said that the nation that forgets its history is doomed. There are alternative plans to create Suez type canal on land which would not disturb Ram Sethu and sea ecology. The sinister way the Indian Government took this decision smacks of its disregard for Hindu sentiments and feelings. It is time Hindus shake off their lethargy and inertia and raise strongest protest on this issue worldwide.

From Amrit Shah, Stanmore

Queen Victoria was in a dilemma as to how to rule the 300 million Indians. She sent a person named Macaulay to find out as to how this people can be ruled. After long considerations he wrote back to queen Victoria with three major observations:

* distort their history
* make them forget their language
* make them forget their religion

This is exactly what the British did. We began to believe that we did not have a history, a culture and that we did not have one language - that is why at times Indians are known as Macaulay children or to put it crudely "coconuts" - brown from outside and white from inside.

Faith can move mountains. If the billions of Indians believe that Ramayana and Mahabharata are not a myth but a reality and that it is part and parcel of our culture - no matter what others think - then and then only we will be able to survive and also help our history survive. We have been divided for thousands of years now it is our turn to prove to ourselves that 21st century is the Hindu century - RAM SETHU WILL SURVIVE if we do not deviate from our beliefs and take assertive action.

From Yash Gokhale, Solihull

Hi,

I am Yash Gokhale and I am 9 years old and I live in the UK.

My nanny used to tell me stories about Ram and Ramsetu.

Please do not destroy the bridge because it is a sign that god was real and all the life there will be destroyed.

Regards

From Nayan Mistry, Slough

I have only recently discovered the true significance of the Ramayana thanks to Indian author, Ashok K. Banker, and his modern re-telling. I have glimpsed the true depth behind what I once thought was a simple religious story of good versus evil. A simple tale this is not, but rather a deeply complex and illuminating discourse on our very existence and the rules and codes by which we should live. So to discover there may be physical evidence of the existence of Rama and the bridge to Lanka was a truly inspiring revelation. To also discover this physical evidence may be destroyed for commercial gain was an even more shocking revelation.

To those who are part of the Sethusamudram Project all I ask is this: please think long and hard about the significance of Ram Sethu to Hindus across the world. The bridge provides a physical link to an event which gives the spiritual and moral backdrop to our lives. To us, your proposals are as absurd as building a shopping mall on the birthplace of Christ to improve employment opportunities in Bethlehem. By demolishing the bridge you will not just be attacking rock and coral, you will be attacking the very beliefs of millions and millions of people. Is that a price worth paying simply for profit?

From Pramod Gokhale, Solihull

This is to voice my concern and protest against the proposed destruction of the ''Ramsetu'' to create a canal for (so-called) economic reasons.

First and foremost, this is a gross attack on the tolerant Hindus and their faith in Ram, from a government which is, to put it mildly, very anti-Hindu. Secularism has been only on paper in the rules of the Constitution and has been used as a weapon to tread on various Hindu beliefs over the years.

Secondly, when there is enough scientific evidence of the facts as to what the destruction of the bridge would bring to the environment (more so in these days when everyone else is so concerned about environment), the Government of India is going backwards and helping in destroying the livelihood of Indian fishermen, the natural ecosystem that is sustained around the bridge and making our borders more vulnerable to the terrorist attacks.

It is high time that the Government realises that the days of harassing Hindus and their beliefs and taking them from granted are over - WE CANNOT LET SOME BUREAUCRAT sitting in his posh office take decisions against the will of what the majority of the Hindus want.

STOP THIS NONSENSE of giving an explanation of Cost Benefit Analysis and economic advantages for destructing the Ramsetu- it is now public truth that this is definitely an ATTACK on Hinduism and their beliefs built over the generations and a huge INSULT of Ramayana and Ram AND WE WILL NOT let this HAPPEN without a fight.

Jai Shree Ram

Namaste

From Yash Chudasama, Birmingham

You should not knock down the holy bridge - It is very special to us Hindus.

If i were them i wouldn't do it.

From Sharad Shah, Birmingham

Bharat is undoubtedly blessed with some of the greatest achievements that mankind can ever achieve or even think of. Ram Setu or the Ram bridge is such an example. It gives pride to us to be the sons and daughters of those great heroes who put their whole might, effort and performed sacrifices to achieve these great feats. Who can imagine a bridge of that magnitude to be built? It requires the great personalities and organising skills to build such bridge. How great a personality Ram was, to command the respect of all the forest people. Who in their sane mind can think of destroying such symbols of pride?

It has to be the anti-Hindu anti-Bharat lobby!

Obviously it is no surprise that people like Sonia Gandhi and Karunanidhi are behind this. After all they have the rakshas/danav nature in them.

Stop such rakshasas!

Yes, we must!!

From Dr Hitesh Parmar, Solihull

If we all have rights and a voice, then at what point did our history, our unified voice and our rights to have a belief in Hindu dharma become non existence?

From the information that I have heard it appears that the Indian government has already made up their mind and will progress to demolish the sethusamudram bridge for a short sighted economic gain.

The plus points highlight a quicker canal for shipways to cross without having to travel round Sri Lanka, but the negatives seem to be mounting up. There is the issue of the environmental impact of the increased flow in traffic, not to mention to risk of any accidents within this tight channel.

A major point that need to be considered is that the ram sethu land formation has a significant importance to the story of Ram. It is a major offence to all Hindus to have the Indian government to even consider let alone start to take actions to set the ball in motion to have the channel cleared.

From Bhupendra Pathak, Cardiff

I am indeed aghast by the project and the insensitivity of the Indian government, which has turned a deaf ear to the popular demand of Hindus for the protection of the bridge.

It is not only a matter of concern for India or Hindus in particular, but also for the world as a whole. The issue had not got prominence simply because our leaders have ignored to attach any importance to it.


This is like a crime against humanity and the civilisation as a whole, which would be unpardonable.

From Yogish Joshi, Redbridge

I think the most fascinating thing about this issue is that the bridge between India and Sri Lanka, that existed only as a legend in the minds of Hindus, is actually present and visible today. To me, this strengthens my faith in our scriptures by providing important validation of one of the key unbelievable facts of the Ramayana – a bridge WAS built by Shri Rama’s army to cross over to Lanka.

The fact that the Indian government wants to destroy this bridge, for questionable benefit, just reflects the perverse thinking they have in regards to Hindus. To them it seems, nothing Hindu is sacred, while anything with a weak significance to Muslims or Christians is given importance.

The key difference is that the Hindus do not yet speak with a united voice. As Hindus become stronger through unity, the views of Hindus will become difficult to ignore, as they are today.

Let’s continue to work for Hindu unity!

From Narendra Patel, Birmingham

For a Hindu, both Ramayan and Mahabharat are imbedded in the scriptures. It is, therefore, a matter of faith - full stop. For thousands of years, Hindus have been inspired by Ramayan and Mahabharat. One could say, it is in our blood. Even though times have changed, Hindus still follow as far as possible, Shree Ram's example as an ideal son, brother, ruler etc.
Ram Setu cannot be detached from our belief and faith and therefore it MUST be protected at all cost. Shree Hanuman moved a mountain to save Laksman. It is time for all concerned Hindus to wake up the country's sleeping fellowman and women to rescue Ram Setu.

Yes, in parallel every effort should be made to bring to the publics attention of the facts which the Government is not telling the people about. The fact that if the project goes ahead it will prove to be an expensive one for as long as it is kept open, it will not work for modern ships, including tankers, which require deeper water. There is the question of security of Bharat and threat to its Thorium resources.

But I come back to what I said at the beginning. Ram Setu is bigger than Sethusamudram Shipping Canal and Hindus all over the world need to rally now and if necessary bring the Congress Government down if that's what it takes to protect out Heritage.
At the same time those in influential position should make it their mission to have Ram Setu declared as a world Heritage.

From Dr Harsha Jani, Harrow

Namaskar

This is an extremely worthy campaign.

The sentiments of millions of Hindus have been completely disregarded by the Government of India in approving the Setusamudran Shipping Canal Project (SSCP). In creating a shipping channel across the Palk strait, severe dredging will totally damage the ecosystem endangering coral and vast species of marine life some of which may even be on the endangered species list.

The Government of India and the local government should protect and safeguard the Ram Setu as our cultural and natural treasure. The Ram setu is part of our religious heritage and is an irreplaceable sources of inspiration for millions of followers of the life of Shri Ram. The Indian government is insensitive to the faith of the Hindus. This action will be similar to the Talibani destruction of the Buddha of Bamyan in Afghanistan. If a government of a predominantly Hindu nation does not protect their religious treasures then our faith will not be respected anywhere.

The Ram setu is a symbol of hope, co-operation and faith (as depicted in the Ramayan). I visited the area of the Ram setu before the SSCP proposal was put forward and I found the place to be an immensely powerful source of inspiration and spiritual fulfillment.

May god be with you

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

From Hasmukh Shah, Bradford

I am in receipt of the campaign documents you have sent about Ram Sethu. It is a great idea to undertake this as part of awareness for the whole of Hindu Samaj. During Navratri, VHP will take this up and promote it to all its members and devotees through 13 of its branches.

There is just one small amendment I think you should consider in the Introduction section. You have mentioned the benefit to shipping time can be considerable if the channel project goes ahead destroying the Ram Bridge. In fact the real saving, according to all maritime bodies are concerned, is only 2 hours!!. This is not sufficient reason to embark on such an expensive project, threatening environment, and future tsunami dangers. You may want to make this small change to the benefit by stating that the real benefit is only 2 hours, instead of considerable saving in shipping time.

From Chandra Joshi, NW London

The recent news of the bridge between Bharat and Sri Lanka being destroyed is news causing upset to several swayamsevikas like myself who have been forwarded this information by our seniors. I am therefore happy to express my thoughts to you upon this matter if it means we can make a difference.

I have one thing to say, if the Indian Government go ahead and do what they plan on doing for the reasons of convenience and practicality, then what does tomorrow bring when another historical landmark such as the Taj Mahal needs to be reduced in size, or destroyed because of some other impracticality which will come along, which it will.

I am more than aware that this talk is to the extreme and that this would never happen, however my point is to look at this in hindsight and if the bridge can be destroyed what are the limits? What comes next? The Indian Government themselves need to think twice before destroying their own heritage, and think why there is no remorse for the bridge which does have so much sentimental value. As already established, the go ahead of the project can potentially cause such environmental impacts, not forgetting the disastrous risk of a Tsunami.

I believe these factors all outweigh the argument for destroying the bridge by miles, and therefore every effort needs to be made to communicate this to the government in order to bring a stop in destroying the sacred bridge with immediate effect.

Thank you for your time.

Regards,


Chandra Joshi, 22

Background information

Ram and Ram Setu - Jai Sri RAM!!!



Ram and Ramayana, live in the hearts of every Hindu, in India, as well as across the world. In order to get Sita back Ram had to get to cross the sea to reach Lanka. With the help of the animal kingdom of the Vanaras, Ram built the bridge we call RAM SETU. After building the bridge Ram crossed the sea, reached Lanka, fought, killed Ravan and got Sita back. The bridge since then has become sacred to every Hindu. Ram lived then and still lives now, in every heart of the Hindus.

Controversy has started when the Indian government have declared the decision to create a canal destroying the sacred bridge. This is despite the fact the bridge is so revered to millions of the Hindus. Not only that - to justify their case they have declared, Ram and Ramayana never existed. Even the Mughals and the British who ruled India have never performed such a despicable attack on the faith of the Hindus.

In Hindu tradition, our entire environment is regarded as sacred and there are specific instances, which provide important symbols for this. Our great rivers e.g. Ganga, Saraswati are sacred for their life giving and life sustaining qualities. The mountains like the Himalayas which source these life giving forces and provide protection and indeed the whole land which is regarded as the Mother in addition to the regard for the millions of plants and animals. The Ram Sethu land formation is an example of such a sacred symbol.

Creating a canal between Sri Lanka and itself means the destruction of the sacred bridge. They say it will bring benefits to the local people, bring jobs to many people in the building of the canal. However there will more cost than benefit. Millions of rupees will go into the building of the canal. It will attract international fishermen driving out the local fishermen and the local industries, destroying local communities en masse. There are non-economic costs. The bridge is a sacred place of worship and pilgrimage to millions of people. It will be a major offence to the Hindus.

There will be huge environmental cost through mass industrialisation and pollution created by it. Natural resources will be exploited, the habitat destroyed and ecosystems changed forever bringing the risks of natural disasters like the tsunami. The destruction of the natural habitat will kill the ancient way of life. The region is home to some 400 endangered marine species including many fish, turtles, and dolphins. These species will be destroyed with the dredging and heavy traffic.

Talking of traffic, what happens when one of these huge cargo ships or oil tankers has an accident and releases toxic waste into the sea? What happens to the more than 4000 species that exist along the Ram Sethu and the local shoreline and communities that depend on the seas for their existence? What happens to the area used for dumping the estimated 62 millions tonnes of silt that need to be excavated for this project? Unfortunately this time round, the ecological and Green lobby seem to have turned their back, in stark contrast to other parallel cases.

There is also vested interest of the nuclear club in the region. This region provides thorium used in the nuclear program to produce energy. There is the world’s largest deposit there – 32%. With the canal dug it will not only upset India’s rich heritage of the natural resource but also attract other big nations or multinationals to excavate and take away the deposit. India won’t be able to protect its rights to the deposits. The waters will be declared international, as there is no such boundary between India and Sri Lanka.

There has been huge resistance in Bharat. On September 12th, several hundred thousands of Hindus took to streets across India. This included mass rallies, and traffic blockades causing large scale disruption.

The Ramayana and Mahabahrat are historical facts written in terms of stories and passed down to generations. THERE IS AMPLE PROOF BESIDES the satellite pictures prove the existence of Ram built bridge. This has recently been endorsed by the famous Sunitha Williams, Indian origin NASA astronaut.

What more evidence is needed? Why is it that Hindus and their faith are always taken for granted, abused and insulted where ever and when ever? It is time we stood against this insults.

Ram was living then, and still lives on. He exists in every Hindu heart.

JAI SHRI RAM

LINKS FOR MORE INFORMATION:
http://www.hinduvoice.co.uk/Issues/20/Rama.htm
http://www.hinduhumanrights.org/India/Bridge.htm
http://sethusamudram.gov.in/ (OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT LINK)
http://www.organiser.org/dynamic/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=203&page=2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sethusamudram_Shipping_Canal_Project (WIKIPEDIA)
http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/sep/15setu.htm
(NEWS ARTICLE ABOUT DENIAL OF RAM’S EXISTENCE)

Introduction to the campaign

There has been opposition to the Sethusamudram project for a number of reasons. These reasons include:

- Religious sentiments: This was a bridge built by Shri Rama, and forms a part of our heritage. Should we destroy this for economic reasons?
- Environmental impact: There are many species of wildlife living in the region sheltered by the bridge. Destroying the bridge and having a major shipping channel through this area would damage their environment and threaten their survival
- Risk of Tsunami: Everyone remembers the horrific Tsunami in December 2004. Experts believe that there are more to come. The bridge provides an important barrier to their progress. Without this barrier, much more of Bharat (India) would be threatened.

Our Campaign
Our campaign has been designed to involve all swayamsevaks and sevikas. Just as the bridge was built by every person putting in their efforts, our campaign to save the bridge needs every swayamsevak to contribute to the effort.

What do we want to achieve?

· The campaign will raise awareness about the issue.
· The campaign will be a demonstration of our intellectual strength. It is traditional for us at the time of Vijaya Dashmi to perform a ‘Shakti Pradarshan’ (demonstration of our strength). In this new age of the ‘intellectual kshatriya’, this campaign is a fitting demonstration of our strength.
· The campaign will demonstrate more commitment than a simple online poll. It is easy to click a few buttons and sign-up to a poll, but writing a short piece is in a different league.